The United Nations kicked off its 2024 General Assembly by approving a group of game-changing proposals that are practically the framework for a One World Government. Glenn’s co-author for “The Great Reset,” “Dark Future,” and his upcoming book, “Propaganda Wars,” Justin Haskins, joins to break down what this “Pact for the Future” will mean for America, especially right before the 2024 election. While the final versions of the proposals were slightly less terrifying than the originals, plenty of draconian agreements were still approved that would give the UN a terrifying level of power over member nations — and the Biden/Harris administration is fully on board. Haskins explains the 3 main proposals, including one that aims to give the UN power over the development of artificial intelligence and the “fact checking” of “disinformation.”
Transcript
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors
GLENN: Justin Haskins. He is the coauthor of the Great Reset.
Dark Future. And the latest book that we've been working on the last year. Which releases October 22nd.
You can preorder it now.
Propaganda Wars. Kind of an important book for today. Especially with everything that we're talking about.
But I want to talk to him now about what has happened at the UN, this weekend. With the United Nations Summit of the Future.
Justin, welcome to the program.
JUSTIN: Thanks, Glenn. Good to be back with you. Wish I had better news.
I'm getting the reputation around Mercury Studios, being kind of like the angel of death.
GLENN: Yeah. I know. I know. I know.
Pretty much everyone who is coming on the show today, is kind of like, huh. More good news for you, huh.
Thank you for watching this so closely. First of all, explain what the Summit of the Future was.
JUSTIN: Yeah. So the Summit of the Future was the culmination of several years of work, really began in the COVID era of 2020, 2021, with the UN secretary general producing this report called our common agenda, which is something that you talked about in several shows and specials and things like that.
And so the culmination of all of that was this summit of the future, that they just held over the weekend. Prior to the start of their general assembly.
As you -- as you noted, there were three agreements, all of which came out of our common agenda.
Passing a future declaration, of future generations, global digital compact.
All of this is meant to dramatically extend the power and influence of the United Nations. That's the whole point of it.
And I don't think it's coincidence, that they designed it. In fact, I know it's not coincidence. But they designed for all of this.
They planned for it, to be proposed and approved immediately before the 2024 US presidential election.
There's a reason for that. Because this is about making sure, that there are plans in place. Infrastructure in place.
If Donald Trump does not win this election. That will further the agenda, of the Biden administration, and sort of the Great Reset crowd.
Moving forward, no matter who wins.
GLENN: So talk to me about the pact for the future. There are three separate parts. And you can look all of this up online.
But give me the summary on the pact for the future. What is that?
JUSTIN: Yeah. So the pact for the future is a very large document, that includes tons and tons of commitments by member nations.
It was approved by basically the entire United Nations over the weekend, including the United States.
In fact, Secretary Blinken, last -- or yesterday afternoon, gave a speech praising the Pact for the Future.
So it includes all kind of radical provisions. Probably the most important one, the one that we have pen looking at, most closely, is something called the emergency platform.
The idea behind this, is to give sweeping powers to the UN secretary general.
In the event of a future, what they call global shock.
Which is not clearly defined in the document.
The idea is essentially to expand the power of the secretary general, so that they can better manage at the UN. International crisis, okay?
So they have COVID in mind when they wrote this. So there is some good news on that, the language for the document, at the last minute. And I've been tracking the various revisions and versions and stuff. Changed. They took some of that emergency platform language out and replaced it with this vague promise, to have the Secretary General develop a plan in the future.
And so they essentially kicked the can down the road.
I think because that provision was becoming a little too controversial.
GLENN: Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.
This is so fascinating.
So they -- it was that the secretary general, could just say, this is an emergency, a global shock.
And it is a -- let's say, a financial shock.
And we've got to stop everybody who is disagreeing with the central banks.
We all have to stand by the central banks. And we have to do this and this. And he could dictate what happens in each country. Could he not?
That's wait it was originally written.
JUSTIN: It was really vaguely worded to give him sweeping powers.
GLENN: Correct.
JUSTIN: While also respecting natural -- to give him sweeping powers. In the event of an emergency.
Correct. Yes.
GLENN: Okay. Now, did they write this, in the way that Democrats write things.
Where it's past. And it says, pretty much, at the -- at the time of implementation, and at the discretion of the secretary.
Such-and-such will happen. Did they find it that way?
Or does he actually have to come back and propose things? Or is it at his discretion?
JUSTIN: He has to -- so up until the very end, the draft was very specifically asking him to give basically, lay out the -- the specific plans for an emergency platform. The -- the final path language says. This is the actual language.
Consider -- they want the secretary general, to consider approaches to strengthen the United Nations system response to complex global shocks.
Within existing authorities.
And dot, dot, dot.
But, in other words, provide -- we want to you repropose all this stuff in the future.
So it did not actually come into international law, under this agreement.
GLENN: Okay. All right. Hang on just a second.
One other thing.
When we say it passed. There was no actual vote, right?
It was, you could vote against it.
Which nobody did. Isn't that right?
JUSTIN: Yeah. They do this a lot at the United Nations. Where they pass things by consensus is what they call it.
And it's essentially to pass things without having to form things.
But it's in essence, passed. Yes.
GLENN: That's crazy.
So the declaration on future generations.
What was that?
And this one did not have anything removed from it, right?
JUSTIN: As far as I know, no. This was the idealistic one. This was the idea behind this was to get younger people more involved in -- think Greta Thunberg type.
More involved in their international agreements, creating a new position at the United Nations, specifically for that purpose.
All these state commitments. Socialist policies. About reducing inequalities within nations. And battling climate change and all of that.
That one to me, was the least objectionable, of all of them. Just because it was so idealistic and vaguely worded. That I don't know damaging it would be, to be totally honest.
GLENN: And the global digital compact is the third part. And that passed.
JUSTIN: Yeah. Yeah. This is the most damaging one, I think. I think this is the most serving one. This passed as well.
Essentially, what this is meant to do, is a few different things.
It's meant to traumatically increase global governance of artificial intelligence.
They want to create a couple of different new organizations. Independent international scientific panel on AI. And the global dialogue on AI. And governance programs.
They want to have more collaboration with big tech. Public/private partnerships. Additional funding into that. All of this is dying to embed artificial intelligence and other majority technologies, with left-wing social justice goals essentially. And they're very clear about that in the document.
So that's a huge thing. We've been warning about for a long time. You know, Dark Future was all about that. We talked about that a ton in Propaganda Wars, and how emerging technologies is going to manipulate every part of our society.
And then, of course, misinformation, disinformation. A safe and secure internet. These kinds of things are riddled throughout the global, digital compact.
This is probably the largest propaganda effort, the UN launched. The largest propaganda effort, I think this -- in modern history.
You probably have to go back to, like the Soviet Union or something.
Before you'll find something like this. They want to create all kinds of different collaborations with the media.
With big tech companies. To control the internet for misinformation. Disinformation. Hate speech. Et cetera.
So specifically, here's an example. This is from the agreement. This was what was actually approved.
Just one of many examples. Quote, provide, promote, and facilitate access to, and dissemination of independent, fact-based, timely targeted, clear, accessible, multi-lingual, and science-based information to counter mis and disinformation.
Strengthening independent and public media. And supporting journalists and media workers. Obviously, we're talking with people who share in their values.
So we're talking about creating fact-checking apparatuses at the United Nations.
Creating and disseminating these so-called fact-based, you know, science-based assessments. Which we've learned in COVID. And other areas. That that's just -- whatever the UN wants it to be.
It's not actually fact-based and science-based.
And collaborating with social media companies. And big tech companies. Which means the opposite side doesn't get to counter it.
They're very clear about calling for social media companies, to ramp up content moderation, and make their platforms more secure and all this other stuff.
So really, you could summarize the whole document like this. The whole point of the global digital exact, is to get everybody off the internet. That the United Nations doesn't like. To silence people, who are not going along with it.
And to create a vast propaganda network, that is going to constantly be pumping out, their own form of misinformation. And disinformation.
All in the name of allegedly getting to the truth. Which of course, is not what they're doing.
GLENN: We just talked to the FCC commissioner, Brendan Carr.
About the sale of the second largest broadcasting group in America and 200 radio stations.
It was paid for with foreign money. Is against the FCC regulations. No more than 25 percent can be from foreign. But Soros wrapped up a bunch of foreign money.
And for some reason, they bypassed the law, that says, that has to go through the Department of Homeland Security and has to have a security check, et cetera, et cetera. So he's going to -- as soon as they officially announce it. Which could be as early as next week, the sale will go through.
We're on some of those stations. You have this happening. The only one that is standing in the way of the global effort to shut voices down.
The only one with any real clout is Elon Musk.
That's one man against the world.
JUSTIN: Yeah. And they want to stop him too.
GLENN: Yeah, I know. This just has empowered all the countries around the world. And empowered them through the United Nations.
And gave them really kind of a blank check, to stop people like Elon Musk, with anything that it takes. Did it not?
JUSTIN: Oh, without a doubt.
I mean, that's the whole purpose of the global digital compact.
That they just passed.
We've talked in previous weeks about this new EU, ESG system that they're building in the European Union, which is also designed to do similar things.
You know, they're trying to close down all of the off-ramps. You've said that for a long time.
That's what they've been doing. And they're almost finished with the job. They don't want people to have any ability, to counter what they're saying in a meaningful way.
Yeah. If you want to sit around your kitchen table and talk to your family about things going on in the world, fine.
But don't do it in public. Don't do it in a meaningful, public way. That's essentially what's going on here.
And as information, and data, and communication has become increasingly more centralized, it's becoming easier and easier and to control it. And manipulate it.
And that is such a huge part of what's going on right now, at the United Nations.
And elsewhere. It's really hard to stop, you know, a thousand newspapers across the country.
It's not hard to stop like five social media companies.
Or five big tech companies. It's not that hard to do that. Or to force them to reform their ways. And that is exactly what's going on here.
And it's incredibly disturbing, but that's the plan.
And there's a reason why, that they're doing all of this, in the final days, final weeks, you know, before the -- the presidential election.
GLENN: Okay. So I know that we have -- I have scheduled an hour with you.
But I feel compelled to talk to the audience, one on one a little bit. Right after this.
So can I get you to come back tomorrow. Because you've talked about the governance of artificial intelligence.
But we haven't talked about the global wealth transfer. Or the embedding the GDP with ESG.
Or any of the other things, that are now locked in on the globe. Can I get you to come back, same time tomorrow?
GLENN: Of course, yeah. Let's do it.
Dustin, thank you so much. I appreciate it.