Climate-Advocate Material Removed From Federal Judicial Manual

The climate change activists have not stopped what they view as a dire crusade. They continue beating the same drum that millions die from climate change every year, and that every weather event is directly linked to climate change. Meanwhile, 2025 set a record for fewest recorded natural disaster deaths in history. Storms have also been around for centuries. Their argument has begun to fall apart, but their ideology has already sunken deep into government roots.

Thanks to the Biden administration, and its era of absolute peak wokeness, the Federal Judicial Manual was rewritten with various woke handbooks. Gender ideology, immigration ideology, and most importantly, climate change. These manuals are what the judges would references and could ultimately be a key in making their rulings.

That has been in the case in various climate related lawsuits, mostly put forward by adolescent school children who have zero true political or climate knowledge. These lawsuits have happened all across the country, and many have won rulings based on these judges following the "science" in the handbooks. But finally, some action has been taken.

A total of 22 Attorneys General successfully got the Federal Judiciary Center to respond to their complain on these handbooks, and subsequently, the climate-advocating language has been removed.

Marc Morano of the Climate Depot says this is a very good step, especially since judges fly blind in climate cases.

"The judges had nothing to go by except these manuals, written by activists, promoted by activist bureaucrats in the government, through an ideology," he says.

For starters, the manual is published in partnership with the National Academies of Science. That group has ties to anti-fossil fuel groups which are developing science to prove oil companies links to natural disasters. That screams conflict of interest, if ever you have heard it.

As for the lawsuits by the elementary, middle, and high school kids across the country, these handbooks certainly helped them. All in their baseless claims of fear, a perception driven by the media and global activists.

"These kids were suing the government for not acting on the climate, therefore endangering their future," says Morano. "The judges would look at these manuals they were issued, then say 'well, these scientists say it is all settled and these kids must be right,' then ruling in their favor."

This step taken by the Trump administration is the first one against woke, activist judge rulings. At least in theory. However, plenty of activist related language remains.

"A lot of these things were written during the Biden era, during the so-called 'peak wokeness,'...I mean, how would a judge even rule on something like men in women's sports, when you cannot even define a woman?" Morano says.

It is a good first step in the battle against activism rampaging through the justice system. But there is a whole building of stairs left to climbs to get the wokeness out and get back to true, unbiased judiciary systems.